Dominance or Parity: What is better for golf?

Think back to the mid-2000’s, how many top notch players can you think of? Well there’s Phil Mickelson of course, Vijay Singh, David Duval, Ernie Els.  Sure there may be a few others but not many.  That’s a short list.  And while these players were good, they were miles behind Tiger Woods.

Now think of 2018.  Dustin Johnson, Justin Thomas, Rory McIlroy, Jordan Spieth, Rickie Fowler, Brooks Koepka, Justin Rose, Henrik Stenson, Jon Rahm and many more make up the new age of golf.   All of these young players are exciting to watch week in and week out.  They all can step up their games and be the best player in the world any given week.  When Tiger Woods was in his prime, no one was taking him off his perch at the top without winning multiple tournaments IN A ROW.

So what is better for the game?  Ratings-wise, Tiger playing in a tournament is going to be significantly better than him not playing.  But ratings aside, I prefer the parity of today’s game.  Not having 1 player heavily favoured to win every week is great for golf.  Especially when you have a very good group of players making up the top notch guys.  Sprinkle in some potential feel good stories from the older guys (like Sergio’s Masters win or Tiger’s comeback) and the 2018 version of the PGA Tour is at it’s all time best in my opinion.

Now just imagine if Tiger wins another major.

Pages: 1 2

Leave a Reply

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: